Respect elderly tenants' rights
Opinion
The sight of workers, cafe patrons and others huddling outside to grab a
smoke, as they used to say, is a common one, even in winter, that
hasn't merited as much as a wink in years. Most of the public would be
cringing, though, if this scene were moved to the courtyards of senior
citizen housing complexes and those shivering smokers were grandma or
grandpa.
And that's one likely result if a bill at the Statehouse
to limit smoking in state-assisted senior housing passes. The proposal
by state representatives Ann Gobi, D-Spencer, and Theodore Speliotis,
D-Peabody, would require larger senior complexes to dedicate at least
one building as smoke-free and smaller facilities to ban smoking in at
least 20 percent of the rooms.
There's little to argue with about
segregating smoking rooms for non-smoking, as has been a longtime
practice at hotels and many apartment buildings. But the details of such
ought to be worked out by the local housing authorities in accordance
with their local situations as part of policy of which new tenants would
be advised before moving in.
Given the experience of the
Attleboro Housing Authority, where the vast majority of senior tenants
are non-smokers, that could result in an even higher percentage of
non-smoking rooms than the bill provides.
Putting the full force
of law behind the idea, however, will push elder smokers out into the
cold, or the heat, or the rain. Unless, of course, someone expects an
octogenarian or nonagenarian smoker to kick the habit as soon as someone
tells them "hey, that's bad for your health."
Even worse, if this bill were to become law, it would reduce the status
of elderly housing occupants from tenants to serfs. Big Brother would be
telling them what they can and can't do in the privacy of their own
homes.
We're happy to see state reps Betty Poirier, R-North
Attleboro, and Bill Bowles, D-Attleboro, steadfastly oppose the bill on
privacy grounds. It's even better that the House, though the bill has
cleared committee, has scheduled no vote on it. This bill may be allowed
to simply fade away in the current legislative session.
Even so,
the bill has its fans. Rep. Steve D'Amico, D-Seekonk, with the kind of
thinking that gave the nation an ill-advised Prohibition of alcohol for a
decade and a half, has declared "anything you can do to get people to
stop smoking is good for them and good for society."
In the event
that this new prohibition proposal hangs around or returns, we would
advise local housing authorities to review their smoking policies and
their ventilation systems. Non-smoking tenants have a legitimate gripe
when smoke from a neighbor's apartment wafts in. But such problems ought
to be solved with local wisdom rather than Big Brotherly arm-twisting.